Turk v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a conviction of murder in the first degree and a sentence to life imprisonment.
No contention is made, and no reasonable contention can be made, that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict of the jury. In many respects the evidence was substantially the same as narrated in Alexander v. State, 337 So.2d 99 (Ala.Cr.App.), wherein appellant had been convicted of murder in the first degree of the same person, Mr. Olmstead Copeland, Jr., a fireman for the City of Tuscaloosa.
The major difference between the testimony in Alexander and the testimony in this case is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Hurst v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Bowens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Dolvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.