Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Zimmerman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1995No. 67059PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Dean Zimmerman (Husband) claims the trial court erred on three points: failure to terminate his maintenance obligation; failure to order a retroactive reduction in maintenance; and, awarding attorney’s fees amounting to $220 to Geraldine Zimmerman (Wife). We affirm.

Husband and Wife dissolved a thirty year marriage in 1987. Husband was ordered to pay Wife $450 per month for maintenance. The marital property division provided for Wife to receive half of Husband’s pension plan, valued at the time of the divorce. In February, 1993, Husband moved to terminate maintenance. The court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. PettitKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Leslie v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Dimmitt v. DimmittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Reese v. ReeseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Crowley v. CrowleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerecke v. GereckeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Wood v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API