Revels v. Industrial Commission

The sole issue on this appeal is whether there is any credible evidence to support the finding that Argyle Revels was not an employee on June 17, 1963, so as to be covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

The statutory definition of “employee” for the purpose of ch. 102, Stats., includes “Every person in the service of another under any contract of hire, express or implied, . . .”

The trial court held that the applicant was aided by the presumption that if at the time of the accident deceased was rendering service for the alleged employer, the relationship of employer and employee existed.…