Legal Opinion

State v. Senz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 2018No. 17CA0001-MPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Mark Senz appeals from his conviction in the Medina County Court of Common Pleas. This Court affirms.

I

{¶ 2} Senz was indicted in March 2015 on one count of petty theft, a first degree misdemeanor, and one count of complicity to commit trafficking in cocaine, a fifth degree felony. Following a trial, a jury found Senz not guilty of complicity to commit trafficking in cocaine and guilty of petty theft. Senz then filed a motion for acquittal pursuant to Crim.R. 29(C) and renewed his previous motions made at trial. The trial court denied the motions and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ZappaOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. State v. BurnetteOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State v. HoffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. McCallisterOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. PinnickOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API