Legal Opinion · Dissent

Richards v. Young

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1989No. 87-1874Published

1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

I do not join the majority opinion because it does not comport with the plain language or legislative purpose of the statutes.

Sections 227.40(5) and 806.04(11) provide that the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR) must be served in specified declaratory judgment actions. JCRAR apparently was served in this case. The statutes are silent regarding the time of service. Both statutes explicitly provide that JCRAR does not become a party to the action until after the approval of the Joint Committee on Legislative Organization (JCLO).1 Thus the statutes do not require JCRAR to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shopper Advertiser, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Harris v. ReivitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  3. Town of Walworth v. Village of Fontana-On-Geneva LakeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API