Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pilecki v. Cromwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2002No. Appeal No. 1Published

1Dissent

Hurlbutt and Kehoe, JJ.

(dissenting). We agree with the majority that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in permitting defendant Children’s Hospital of Buffalo (Hospital) and defendant Hospital personnel to present expert testimony that the injuries to plaintiff’s daughter were caused by an intrauterine infection resulting from the Coxsackie virus. We disagree with the majority, however, that there should be a new trial because plaintiff was confronted with a “new and highly complex defense on the eve of trial.” With respect to the belated disclosure of the expert testimony on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nordhauser v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Peters v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Williams v. BrosnahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API