Legal Opinion

State v. Moraga

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1965No. 1495PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, justice.

Appellant, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was convicted and sentenced to a term of not less than thirteen nor more than fifteen years on each of two counts (to run concurrently) for the unlawful sale of narcotic drug (heroin) in violation of A.R.S. § 36-1002.02, as amended. From the conviction, sentence, and the denial of his motion for a new trial, he appeals.

On October 8, 1963, about seven o’clock in the evening, Henry Lugo, who had been hired as an informer by Edmund C. Cleveland, an agent for the Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, went to Room 124 in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Elliott Kahaner, Antonio Corallo and James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. State v. GeorgeArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. GrijalvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Finley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. People v. KinsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. EastlackArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. ReyesArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Crowe v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. ReyesArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. AcostaArizona Supreme Court · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API