Cable v. IBM Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In a defamation action, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered June 9,1983, as required her to provide further responses to certain interrogatories. H Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Plaintiff’s time to respond to the interrogatories is extended until 10 days after service upon her of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. | As to item No. 8, plaintiff has made a blanket claim of privilege, stating, inter alia, that the identity of an expert is not subject…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Kaplan v. HerbsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Adams v. ImperialAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Adams v. ImperialAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014