Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 14, 2010No. AC 32057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

“To establish a violation of [General Statutes] § SSa-Sda 1 . . . the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, with intent to cause the death of another person . . . cause [d] the death of such person .... [T]he specific intent to kill is an essential element of the crime of murder. To act intentionally, the defendant must have had the conscious objective to cause the death of the victim.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Aviles, 107 Conn. App. 209, 217, 944 A.2d 994, cert. denied, 287 Conn. 922, 951 A.2d 570 (2008). The sole issue in…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. State v. FlemingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. State v. AvilesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. State v. MelendezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. State v. GillConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  3. Robinson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. State v. FranklinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  5. State v. FriendConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API