Legal Opinion

Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Hawthorne & Sheble Mfg. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1909No. 175PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Victor Talking Machine Company against the Hawthorne & Sheble Manufacturing Company. On motion for leave to file supplemental bill.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

This is a suit to redress the infringement of a patent. "The bill prays for an account of profits, the delivery of the infringing apparatus for the purpose of destruction, and the usual injunction. The defendant appeared and answered, and took part in the examination of the witnesses that were called to make out the complainant’s prima facie case. Shortly after the prima facie case was closed, the defendant was adjudged a bankrupt upon adverse proceedings, and a trustee was duly elected. The complainant now asks leave to file a supplemental bill to make the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re United Button Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1906
  2. Chester v. Life Ass'n of AmericaUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
  3. In re Boston & Fairhaven Iron WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1885
  4. Weston Electrical Instrument Co. v. American Instrument Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maddux v. Gardner and MarbleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Hall v. MainDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API