Legal Opinion

United States v. Fleming

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1966No. 3735PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge:

Appellee was originally brought into court on a charge of sodomy. 1 At the preliminary hearing the sodomy complaint was nol-prossed. 2 Thereupon an information was filed charging that appellant did “attempt to commit the act of Oral Sodomy on the person of Norman J. Landry, an adult male.” Appellee pleaded not guilty and demanded trial by jury. Later he moved to dismiss the information “for insufficiency in that it did not allege an overt act.” This motion was granted, and with consent of the court an amended information was filed. This last information charged that appellee…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Strader v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. EaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. State v. ShepardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. In Re United States of America, United States of America v. Ray Cowan and Jack Jacobsen, Wayne O. Woodruff, Special ProsecutorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Robert Louis Ammidown, United States of America v. Robert L. AmmidownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  4. People v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. United States v. James Thomas York and Stephen Joseph YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API