Legal Opinion
Russell Earl Shouse v. Karl H. Ljunggren
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1986No. 85-3579PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Russell Earl Shouse appeals from an order granting summary judgment for Karl H. Ljunggren in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We affirm.
On July 17, 1980, Shouse, an Idaho state parolee, committed “lewd and lascivious acts” with a twelve-year-old girl, a violation of Idaho law. Ljunggren, the sheriff of Fremont County, Idaho, learned of the incident the next day and asked Shouse to come to the sheriff’s office to discuss the matter. Ljunggren knew that Shouse was on parole.
After receiving Miranda warnings, Shouse admitted in writing that he had engaged in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Santiago Amaro v. The Continental Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cion Peralta v. T. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Hydranautics v. FilmTec Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2003
- Federal Insurance Company v. Scarsella Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Cion Peralta v. T. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Federal Insurance v. Scarsella Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.