Van Valkenburg v. Geron
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The material question in this case is the boundary line between a lot of complainant (appellant) and one of respondent (appellee). It is the north line of complainant’s lot and the south line of respondent’s lot. The controversy affects the ownership of a strip of land about 27 feet wide extending along the north line of complainant’s lot.
Complainant’s lot was cut out of the southeast corner of a large one, all of which formerly was the homestead of the late Chief Justice Brickell in Huntsville. Respondent’s lot consists of all the balance of it including the dwelling.
In 1888…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dunn v. StrattonMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- Kyle v. ClinkscalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Anderson v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Kennard v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Maxcy v. BoylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spires v. NixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Blalock v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Cloud v. Southmont Development CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Harmon v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Watts v. Kyle Realty CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1962