Legal Opinion

Maggard v. Essar Global Ltd.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided April 25, 2014No. Case No. 2:12CV00031PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES P. JONES, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Sylvain A. Maggard, has sued the defendants, an international conglomerate and its related entities (herein collectively called “Essar”) for a finder’s fee that he claims is owed him following the $600 million acquisition by Essar of a coal mining company, Trinity Coal Corporation (“Trinity Coal”). Essar agreed that it hired Maggard, but contends that it was only as a consultant. It paid him a monthly salary and expenses and concedes that he was a “valued and valuable member of Essar’s deal team, [who] devoted considerable time…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McPike v. Zero-Gravity Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API