Legal Opinion

Brown v. Judd

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1906Published

Appeal prom District Court, Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

The plaintiff was the purchaser on execution sale of a mortgagor’s equity of redemption. The defendants were the attorneys for the mortgagee on foreclosure under a power of sale ■contained in the mortgage, which also provided that the mortgagee might retain from the proceeds of the sale a reasonable attorney’s fee. The action is brought to recover, under a count for money had and received an alleged excess retained as an attorney’s fee from the proceeds of the foreclosure sale, — on the theory that such excess is a part of the surplus payable to the mortgagor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  2. Soderberg v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Atwell v. JenkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Bank of the Metropolis v. First Nat. Bank of Jersey CityU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
  5. Wallis v. ShellyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API