Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Foulke

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1904No. 13,665PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Rooks district court; Charles W. Smith, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J. :

This was an action of ejectment brought by Enos C. Foulke to recover from Thomas J. O’Brien the possession of a tract of land in Rooks county. Foulke had a complete paper title, as shown by a connected chain back to the government, while O’Brien claimed under an oral contract of purchase, and possession and improvements made in pursuance of the alleged purchase. Each asserted title from a common grantor, named Houpt. O’Brien claimed that he purchased the land from Houpt at a stipulated price and that he was to have until a fixed time…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baldwin v. SquierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Skinner v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Muir v. ChandlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Judy v. BuckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Peterson v. HagamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  5. Dunn v. WinansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API