Legal Opinion

Cooper v. . Rochester Ice Cream Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered September 28, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The language complained of is not libelous per se.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered September 28, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The language complained of is not libelous per se. (Odgers on Libel & Slander, 93; Hemmens v. Nelson, 138 N. Y. 517; Morrison v. Smith, 177 N. Y. 369; Hayes v. Ball, 78 N. Y. 418; Reporters’ Assn. v. Sun P. & P. Co., 186 N. Y. 437.) The letter in question was privileged. (Klinck v. Colby, 46 N. Y. 427; Hamilton…

1Opinion of the CourtCardozo, J.

The action is for libel. The plaintiff is a manufacturer of ice cream. The defendant is one of his competitors. Among the plaintiff’s customers was a dealer by the name of .Garvey. The defendant was anxious to win Garvey’s custom for itself. In that hope it sent a salesman to solicit the coveted trade. On the salesman’s return, he reported to the defendant a conversation between himself and Garvey’s wife. She told him, so, at least, he reported, that the plaintiff’s cream was satisfactory; that in all their dealings there had been but one occasion when there was anything wrong about it; and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . BallNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Demos v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Garby v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Garby v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. United Feature Syndicate, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Harrison v. WinchellNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API