Legal Opinion

Haymaker v. Alford

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 12, 1921No. 23,053PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Neosho district court; Shelby C. Brown, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

May C. Haymaker, a widow, was the owner of a quarter section of farm land, subject to a mortgage of $2,800. She had a talk with Charles E. Alford, who had been occupy*711ing it as a tenant, with regard to its sale to him. Her version is that an oral agreement was reached that he was to have it for $6,500, he assuming the payment of the mortgage in addition to paying her that amount. His version is that the agreement was that he was to pay $6,500, less the amount of the mortgage, which he was to assume. The next day Alford, accompanied by Byrd H.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. DarlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. McCandliss v. KelseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stapleton v. HartmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Cushenbery v. Waite-Phillips Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API