Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cox v. Metropolitan State Bank, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 5, 1959No. 18230Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Frantz

specially concurring:

It is my conviction that aim has not been directed toward the center of the problem presented by the record in this case, but rather, and at best, toward peripheral questions, all of which induce me to urge that we resolve the only question which, in my opinion, invites *590solution, and which would be dispositive of this controversy. I respectfully expostulate with my colleagues that we miss the point of the case in directing our considerations to questions of who owned the vehicle, tracing trust funds, and so forth.

Open sesame to the solution of the dispute between the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Town of Manitou v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  2. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Bromfield v. CochranSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. DennisWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. First National Bank v. Fleming State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API