Legal Opinion

Roon v. Van Schouwen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 19, 1949No. Gen. No. 44,790PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Feinberg

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the garnishee defendant. Plaintiff obtained a judgment in a personal injury action against defendant Van Sehouwen for alleged injuries, occurring on April 9, 1945. Defendant Van Sehouwen had an insurance policy with the garnishee. The garnishee defended upon the ground that the policy had been canceled and was not in force at the time of the accident. The only question presented upon this appeal is whether the garnishee had canceled the policy in accordance with the provision in the policy. The provision read:

“This policy may be cancelled at any time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Budelman v. American InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Fisher ex rel. Kiniry v. Associated Underwriters, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  3. McNellis v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roon v. Van SchouwenIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Yacko v. CurtisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Roon v. Van SchouwenIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Yacko v. CurtisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Yacko v. CurtisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API