Legal Opinion

Howell v. United States

District Court, D. Utah

Decided October 7, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00571Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF UTAH ROBYN ANN HOWELL, MEMORANDUM DECISION Petitioner, AND ORDER v. Case No. 2:22-cv-571 CW Related Case No: 2:18-cr-379 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Judge Clark Waddoups INTRODUCTION Petitioner Robyn Ann Howell (“Petitioner”) pled “guilty to theft of government money,” in violation of

18 U.S.C. § 641

(hereinafter “§ 641”). She now petitions the court “to vacate and set aside her conviction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255” because her “plea was the product of ineffective assistance of counsel.” Petition to Vacate, at 1 (ECF No. 1).1…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. United States v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API