Legal Opinion
In re the City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbraham N. Geller, J.
In this condemnation proceeding claimant, Aero-Chatillon Corporation, engaged in the business of manufacturing scales, occupied the building comprising Damage Parcel 134. The fee award did not include the fixtures installed by claimant. A separate trial has been held with regard to the fixture claim filed by this claimant.
Title vested on November 2, 1964. Claimant continued in possession until January, 1966 after being notified by the city in 1965 that it would have to move out. Claimant thereafter moved to a new location in Kew Gardens, Queens, taking with it practically all of the machines…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McRea v. Central National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Matter of City of New York (Whitlock Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- United States v. Certain Property Located in Borough of ManhattanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rose v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976