Legal Opinion
Caizza v. Caizza
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 13, 1974No. 44017PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
291 So.2d 569 (1974)
Jacqueline Ann CAIZZA, Petitioner,
v.
Nello CAIZZA, Respondent.
No. 44017.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 13, 1974.
Stanley L. Seligman, Hollywood, and Andrew I. Friedrich, for appellant.
ADKINS, Chief Justice.
This is a direct appeal from the Circuit Court of Broward County which held that the residency requirement of Fla. Stat. § 61.021, F.S.A., was constitutional. We have jurisdiction.
Petitioner, plaintiff below, on June 4, 1973, filed a petition for dissolution of marriage seeking dissolution of the marriage, a restraining order, custody of the children, alimony and child…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AdamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Lemon v. LemonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Hoffman v. HoffmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Ashley v. AshleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- Merritt v. MerrittDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979