Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Norman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1971No. Appeal, 39Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Bell :

The decision of the Majority in this 1962 murder case is so unrealistic as to be incomprehensible. In 1962, appellant was tried before a jury and convicted of second-degree murder. He was represented throughout the trial and the sentencing proceeding by family-retained counsel. No post-trial motions were filed and no appeal was taken from the judgment of sentence.

In 1965, appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and in 1967 this Court unanimously affirmed the Order of the lower Court, which dismissed the writ. See Commonwealth ex…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aubrey Pate v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby Prison, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. John G. O'Brien C-8019 v. J. F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Norman v. StitzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Malachi Beard, Jr. v. Alfred T. Rundle, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API