Legal Opinion
Patino v. Einhorn
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 3, 1996No. 95-1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
670 So.2d 1179 (1996)
Diana and Ernesto PATINO, Appellants,
v.
Dr. Neil EINHORN, individually, d/b/a Einhorn Eye Care Center, and ALP Freddy's Limited Partnership d/b/a Freddy's, Appellees.
No. 95-1990.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 3, 1996.
Dennis Koltun and Scott Lazar, for appellants.
Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas and Marlene S. Reiss, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and COPE, JJ.
2Per curiam
We find that the trial court erred in requiring the plaintiffs in a negligence action against an optometrist to meet the presuit requirements of Chapter 766, Fla.Stat. (1995). The…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Weinstock v. GrothSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- GBB Investments, Inc. v. HinterkopfDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
4Cited by3 opinions
- Integrated Health Care Services, Inc. v. Lang-RedwayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Dirga v. ButlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1999