Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Singh

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 28, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lee L. Holzman, J.

In this proceeding commenced by the petitioner, the decedent’s father, to recover funds that were distributed from this estate, a trial was scheduled for November 18, 2008, without prejudice to *289the right of the petitioner, who resides in India, to make a formal application for him to testify without traveling to the United States (see Estate of Singh, NYLJ, May 19, 2008, at 30, col 2).

The petitioner now moves, pursuant to CPLR 3101 (a), for an order directing that his deposition and those of other witnesses who also reside in India be conducted by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rogovin v. RogovinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. LaRusso v. Brookstone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yu Hui Chen v. Chen Li ZhiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. American Bank Note Corp. v. DanieleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. In re the Estate of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API