Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gay v. Reyburn

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original Proceedings by Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtNortoni, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus. The alternative writ issued from this court and upon return thereto being made, the court appointed Phillip W. Haberman, Esq., a member of the St. Louis bar, to hear the testimony and report his conclusion thereon, for there appeared to be an issue of'fact between the parties.

The relator is one of the judges of the county .court of Iron county and respondent is the clerk of that court. It- appears the relator desired to inspect and ascertain the condition of the books and records and the state of the accounts of respondent, county clerk, and to this end…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coquard v. National Linseed Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Shumate v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1866
  3. State ex rel. Watkins v. Donnell Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. New Haven & Northampton Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
  5. People ex rel. Spire v. General Committee of Republican PartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tadlock v. MooneyhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. State to Use of Nee v. GorsuchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Gay v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API