Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bryan v. Employers National Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 19, 1988No. 87-255Published

1DissentJohn I. Purtle, Justice

The language in the insurance policy relied upon by the majority does not “preclude recovery if any insured commits a criminal act.” The language is designed to prevent any insured from collecting for a loss resulting by his “fraudulent, dishonest, or criminal act” or for loss resulting from such acts done “at the instigation” of such insured. This language was not intended to give the insurance company an excuse from paying a loss to an innocent insured even though another insured intentionally caused the loss.

The majority has adopted the “guilt by association” doctrine which certainly is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. HendrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Mechanics' Insurance v. Inter-Southern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Caffey v. CaffeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API