Legal Opinion

Hargrove v. Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1908PublishedCited by 17 opinions

ActioN heard before W. B. Allen, J., and a jury, at December (Special) Term, 1907, of Samipson, to vacate and s§t aside a'proceeding for partition and the decree therein rendered by the Clerk, of the Superior Court of Sampson County. Defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBkowN, J.

The record discloses that on 24 September, 1901, an ex parte proceeding for partition was commenced before the Clerk in the name and behalf of John E. Wilson, the defendant in this ease, and of Sarah A. Hargrove, and the other plaintiffs in this action, for the sale for partition of the land described in the complaint. The petition is signed by certain attorneys as “solicitors for petitioners,” and is verified by the oath of J. E. Wilson. On the same day a decree of sale was made by the Clerk, and a commissioner was appointed with authority to sell the land at either public auction or private…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Tate v. . MottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Rackley v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Burgess v. . KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Morris v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Starnes v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Downing v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Long v. Town of RockinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API