Legal Opinion
Covenant Bank for Savings v. Cohen
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 10, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-1817(SSB)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court are motions brought by defendants Bank Hapoalim and David Barr to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and to grant partial summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the court holds that an assertion of jurisdiction over these two defendants would be inconsistent with constitutional due process. Because of this holding, the court does not consider the motion for partial summary judgment.
I. Background and Procedure
The present dispute arises out of a series of loan transactions between plaintiff Covenant Bank…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Alexander v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Violanti v. Emery Worldwide A-CF Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Jacobs v. Walt Disney World, Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Osteotech, Inc. v. Gensci Regeneration Sciences, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- In Re Royal Dutch/Shell Transport Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.