Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Schmidt

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 2019No. NUMBER 2018 CA 0202Published

1Opinion of the CourtGuidry, J.

Defendant, Timothy Schmidt, appeals from a judgment of the trial court finding him guilty of contempt of court and ordering him to pay $110,758.38, representing his pro rata share of medical expenses found by the court to be medically necessary for the parties' minor child and which were not covered by insurance, $15,000.00 in attorney's fees, and $2,470.50 in costs. For the reasons that follow, we amend in part and as amended, affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Timothy and Christy Schmidt were married on February 3, 1996, and one child was born of the marriage on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rogers v. DickensLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Short v. ShortLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Ficarra v. FicarraLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Louisiana Commerce & Trade Ass'n v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Adams v. AdamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API