Legal Opinion

Cogswell v. Hoguet

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 2, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMoran, P. J.

The ground on which this writ of error is prosecuted is that there was no evidence before the jury on which to find a verdict. The bill of exceptions recites that the plaintiff introduced the following testimony:

iMr. Brooks: Gentlemen of the jury, this is an action brought by the plaintiff in this case against the defendant for recovery for a bill of goods; I presented the bill to the defendant, and he admitted that he owed it.

The Court: That will do; what is the amount due?

Mr. Brooks: §753.65.

The Court: Gentlemen of the jury, that will be your verdict.

Which was all the evidence offered in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Slauter v. WhitelockIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Lawrence v. HoughtonNew York Supreme Court · 1809

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. DelgadoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API