Legal Opinion

Kinfe v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 7, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.), dated March 1994, which denied their separate motions for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that material issues of fact exist which preclude awarding summary judgment in favor of the defendants (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the allegedly hazardous condition was open and obvious and thus did not create an unreasonable risk of harm…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. O'Neil v. Port Authority of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Caris v. MeleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Pilato v. DiamondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Ray v. Crown Drug Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanna v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Repecki v. Home Depot USADistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  3. Silberberg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API