Legal Opinion

Ingalls v. Bulkley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1853PublishedCited by 9 opinions

This cause was heard before Woodson, Judge, at the March term, 1853, of the Morgan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtTreat, C. J.

This was an action of replevin, brought by Bulkley against Ingalls, to recover the possession of a horse. The declaration was in the detinet only. Plea, non detinet. A witness testified, that the defendant told him some time after the suit was commenced, that the plaintiff first sent his negro boy for the horse; that he afterwards sent Whittle for the horse, and then the sheriff; that he refused to let the negro or Whittle have the horse; that the plaintiff might have had the horse if he had demanded him in person and paid the damages, but he was afraid to come after his horse. It was proved…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. John v. O'ConnelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
  2. Watt v. PotterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1820

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Dolphin v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  3. Alexander v. BoyleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  4. Hackett v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  5. Leman v. BestAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API