Legal Opinion

United States v. Hicks

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1930No. 5269PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment or final order unconditionally disbarring appellant, an attorney at law. It comes to ns under the title of “Raine Ewell vs. Hon. A. F. St. Sure, as U. S. District Judge,” etc., but the only relief sought is a reversal of the judgment, and the only relation the appellee so named has to the controversy arises out of the fact that as such judge he presided at the trial and entered the judgment. The title we have used is found in some of the papers and is perhaps as appropriate as any for a proceeding whieh, as will he seen, is somewhat…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Ex Parte BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re ClaiborneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  2. In the Matter of the Los Angeles County Pioneer Society, a Corporation, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. Laughlin v. WheatCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  4. In re SchachneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  5. Wilbur v. HowardDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API