Legal Opinion

Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Cleveland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 16, 1942No. 15430PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Associate Justice Stukes :

After hearing this controversy on circuit, Judge Mann commented that upon studying the record and considering the arguments of counsel he was convinced that the Master’s report is correct, whereupon he adopted the latter as his judgment. We are constrained after consideration to do likewise.

It may reasonably be suspected that had the testator foreseen the untimely death of his only son, he would have provided for the continuance of the monthly allowance to the infant child of the latter, and the boy’s grandmother could…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Patterson v. ClevelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. HOLCOMBE-BURDETTE v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. In Re Estate of PrioleauSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. WoodDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API