Legal Opinion

Coneton v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 23, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while alighting from one of the defendant’s cars at or near the division line between Quincy and Brain-tree. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the presiding judge* *29directed a verdict for the defendant. The case comes here on the plaintiff’s exceptions to the ruling thus made, and to the exclusion of certain evidence.

The accident happened on August 19, 1904, between 8 and 8.30 in the evening.. The place where the plaintiff attempted to alight was on a switch or turnout near a signal box. It was the duty of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oddy v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Spaulding v. Quincy & Boston Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bendett v. BendettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Elger v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Leavitt v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Bush v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Kakridis v. Hyundai GroupMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API