Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Lambert

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1980No. 41133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

This proceeding to revive a judgment arises out of a divorce decree entered prior to the effective date of the new Dissolution of Marriage Act,1 § 452.300 et seq., RSMo Supp.1973. The trial court purported to revive the portions of the divorce decree which allegedly awarded alimony and child support. Appellant contends his obligation to pay monthly alimony and child support is contractual and not decretal and that, therefore, the trial court erred in reviving the professed decree.

At the time of their divorce, the parties entered an “Agreement” which, as pertinent,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heredia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Nelson v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Keltner v. KeltnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Williams v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Goodman v. GoodmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Solis v. TeaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Brewer v. BrewerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Klinge v. KlingeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Bloss v. CuddiheeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Shane v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API