Bank of Spartanburg v. Mahon
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before DanTzuír, J., Spartanburg, November, 1905. Action by Bank of Spartanburg against G. H. Mahon. From' judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. cite: 1 McM., 76; 3 Rich., 134; 53 N. Y., 307; 6 Rich., 497; 45 S. C., 519; 1 Dan. Neg. Ins., sec. 142. Mr. McCullough cites: 33 & C., 329; 7 Rich., 13; 63 S, C., 436; 92 Ami. Dec., 99; 51 S. C., 58; 98 Ala., 484; 1 Ency., 336; Norton on Bills and Notes, 107; 45 S. C., 373; 4 Ency., 476; 37 S. C., 463; 41 & C., 81; 2 Ency., 253.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This is an appeal from an order of nonsuit. The complaint sets out three causes of action, in the first of which it is alleged, that James and Stewart made their promissory note in writing, on the 15th of September, 1904, and thereby promised to pay to the order of the defendant, G. H. Mahon, the sum of $3,000. ' The third paragraph of the complaint is as follows: “That the said G. H. Mahon then and there, and before this action was brought, indorsed the said note to the plaintiff herein for value, who is now the legal owner and holder…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rucker v. SmokeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- American &c. Co. v. FelderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
- Johnston v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
- Watson v. BarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- First Nat. Bk. of Hartsville v. WoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- First Nat. Bk. of Hartsville v. WoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918