Legal Opinion

Hemmerich v. City of Geneva

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The plaintiffs-appellants challenge the propriety of an order directing a compulsory reference under section 466 of the Civil Practice Act.

In the course of constructing a sewage disposal plant for the defendant municipality, plaintiffs claim to have encountered in the work of excavation a stratum of water-bearing sand which made it. necessary to furnish sheet piling, pumps, extra labor and to do an. amount of excavation in excess of contract requirements. Resisting; plaintiffs’ suit for an amount claimed to be due for these items and in support of the order of reference which was granted upon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Camp v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Thayer v. . McNaughtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Hedges v. Methodist Protestant ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Loverin v. Lenox Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schanback v. SchanbackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Davidson v. SterngassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Smiley v. National Fire InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API