Legal Opinion

Bogart v. Walker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This court has held that the operation of buses upon the city streets, without the grant of a franchise by the board of estimate and apportionment and without the issuance by the board of transportation of a certificate of convenience and necessity, is illegal. (Brooklyn City Railroad Co. v. Whalen, 191 App. Div. 737; Huff v. City of New York, 202 id. 425.) The views expressed by this court were followed by the Appellate Division in the First Department in Kingsbridge Railway Co. v. City of New York (204 App. Div. 369, per Dowling, J. [now P. J.].) It was also held in these cases that an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brooklyn City Railroad v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Wisconsin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Kingsbridge Railway Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bee Line, Inc. v. La GuardiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. City of New York v. Bee Line, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Walsh v. LaGuardiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API