Legal Opinion

Longley v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1918No. 9433PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint; from Whitfield superior court—Judge Tarver. July 28, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtXjJJKE, J.

1. A parol notice or request to the creditor, by a surety upon a promissory note, to bring suit, will not operate as a compliance with the statute (Civil Code of 1910, § 3546), which authorizes a surety, at any time after the debt is due, to give, notice in writing to the creditor to' proceed to collect the debt out of the principal, or of itself have the effect to discharge the surety. See Johnson v. Longley, 142 Ga. 814 (83 S. E. 952).(a) If, however, the surety is assured by the holder of the note that suit will be brought to the next term of the court, and because of such

' assurance he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LongleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. Polhill v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turbeville v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API