Legal Opinion

Findley v. Buchanan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1818PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Clark Circuit Court. — Case, by Buchanan against Findley, for malicious prosecution.' The declaration contained two counts, the substance of which was, that the defendant, falsely and maliciously and without probable cause, procured a justice’s warrant against the plaiutiif, upon a charge of felony, and caused him to be arrested, and taken into custody; that nothing being shown against the plaintiff, he was afterwards, by the justice, wholly acquitted and…

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Clark Circuit Court. — Case, by Buchanan against Findley, for malicious prosecution.' The declaration contained two counts, the substance of which was, that the defendant, falsely and maliciously and without probable cause, procured a justice’s warrant against the plaiutiif, upon a charge of felony, and caused him to be arrested, and taken into custody; that nothing being shown against the plaintiff, he was afterwards, by the justice, wholly acquitted and discharged. — Plea, not guilty. — Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff below. Findley assigned for error: 1st, That the…

1Per curiam

The errors assigned are insufficient; and the judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages, and costs.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newell v. DownsIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Clarkson v. M'CartyIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  3. McGregor v. ArmillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
  4. Townsend v. JemisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API