Legal Opinion
State v. Bailey
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 29, 2000No. AC 16924PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, C. J.
The defendant, Glenn Bailey, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of four counts of sexual assault in *761the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 and four counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 53-21. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) refused to give a missing witness instruction to the jury and (2) instructed the jury on the state’s burden of proof. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. MalaveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. SmallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. OliverConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- State v. QuinonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Raybeck v. Danbury Orthopedic Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Bailey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. HollbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.