Legal Opinion

People v. Miller

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 7, 1997No. 1-95-3007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE WOLFSON

delivered the opinion of the court:

At some point in almost every criminal trial a prosecution witness will be asked to look around the courtroom and determine whether the perpetrator of the crime is present. If and when the witness points to the defendant, an important part of the State’s case falls into place. The record reflects the identification. The prosecutor can argue the force of a courtroom identification.

In the case before us, the roles were reversed. The defense asked that a defense witness be allowed the opportunity to identify the State’s key witness. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. SlimIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. BurgessIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. SimpsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. PerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. People v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. People v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. People v. PerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API