Legal Opinion
Rosensweig v. Bally Total Fitness Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 18, 2001No. 99-56992; D.C. No. CV-98-05578-WDKPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Mathon & Rosenzweig appeals the district court’s imposition of sanctions upon it in this action where it represented Marilyn Rosenzweig against Bally Total Fitness Corp. We modify the judgment and affirm.(1) After this case was removed to the federal district court, M & R willfully failed to respond to that court’s order to show cause regarding jurisdiction. Instead, it continued with the litigation in the district court until it lost a ruling on a motion to dismiss. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Then it moved to remand to the state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re E.R. Fegert, Inc., Debtor. Dan O'rourke, Trustee v. Seaboard Surety Company Coral Construction Company, Inc. Shotwell Paving CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- PRIMUS AUTOMOTIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudolph A. BATARSE, Defendant, Jan C. Nielsen, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- In Re: Keegan Management Co., Securities Litigation. Michael Moore, and Lieff, Cabraser & Heimann Elizabeth J. Cabraser v. Keegan Management Company, a Delaware Corporation, Michael Moore, and Richard L. Jaeger Feldman, Waldman & Kline v. Keegan Management Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.