Legal Opinion

ALLEN D. GILES, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 2016No. SD34275PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGary W. Lynch, P.J.

OPINION AUTHOR

Allen D. Giles (“Movant”) voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his constitutional right to assistance of counsel and proceeded to trial without counsel on charges of first-degree statutory rape and first-degree statutory sodomy. See sections 566.032 and 566.062. 1 He was convicted of those charges following a jury trial and sentenced to two consecutive terms of life imprisonment. His convictions were affirmed on direct appeal to this court in State v. Giles, 386 S.W.3d 822 (Mo.App. S.D. 2012). In Giles, we held that the trial court committed no error in allowing the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API