Legal Opinion

Sydney Hayes, and Teddy Raburn, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated v. DC Star Security Agency Inc., d/b/a Siegun Security, and David Lee, individually

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided March 30, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00986Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 25-cv-00986-PAB-SBP SYDNEY HAYES, and TEDDY RABURN, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiffs, v. DC STAR SECURITY AGENCY INC., d/b/a Siegun Security, and DAVID LEE, individually, Defendants. ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration [Docket No. 19]. Plaintiffs filed a response. Docket No. 27. Defendants filed a reply in support of their motion. Docket No. 30. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Sydney Hayes and Teddy Raburn worked…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API