Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sanders v. S.C. Dep't of Motor Vehicles

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 30, 2019No. Appellate Case No. 2016-000228; Opinion No. 5620Published

1DissentHill, J.

HILL, J.:

Recognizing the simple word "hearsay" and its troublemaking associate "truth of the matter asserted" can spark reasonable disagreements among reasonable people, I respectfully depart from the view of my friends in the majority.

The majority finds the officer's testimony about what Nurse Albright told him and what she stated on a report were not hearsay because they were "not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, i.e. that Sanders was unable to submit to a breath test." The majority explains further that Albright's out-of-court statements "were not offered to prove Sanders…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Ernest Detrich, Ahmad Shah Nusraty and Mohammad Dawood Nusraty, Robert Ernest DetrichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Player v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Peake v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. City of Columbia v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. StacyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API