Sanders v. S.C. Dep't of Motor Vehicles
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1DissentHill, J.
HILL, J.:
Recognizing the simple word "hearsay" and its troublemaking associate "truth of the matter asserted" can spark reasonable disagreements among reasonable people, I respectfully depart from the view of my friends in the majority.
The majority finds the officer's testimony about what Nurse Albright told him and what she stated on a report were not hearsay because they were "not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, i.e. that Sanders was unable to submit to a breath test." The majority explains further that Albright's out-of-court statements "were not offered to prove Sanders…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Robert Ernest Detrich, Ahmad Shah Nusraty and Mohammad Dawood Nusraty, Robert Ernest DetrichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Player v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
- Peake v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- City of Columbia v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- State v. StacyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.