Legal Opinion
McMorrow v. Mondelez International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 8, 2022No. 3:17-cv-02327Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICK MCMORROW, et al., Case No. 17-cv-02327-BAS-JLB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER: 13 v. 14 MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC., (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR 15 FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS Defendant. SETTLEMENT (ECF No. 206); 16 17 (2) GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND 18 SERVICE AWARDS (ECF No. 200); 19 AND 20 (3) OVERRULING OBJECTION TO 21 MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARDS 22 (ECF No. 201) 23 24 Patrick McMorrow, Marco Ohlin, and Melody DiGregorio (collectively, 25 “Plaintiffs”) commenced this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Mego Financial Corporation Securities Litigation Christopher Dunleavy A. Peyser v. Michael Nadler v. Robert Nederlander Jerome J. Cohen Herbert B. Hirsch Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. Deloitte & ToucheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1473, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,064 the Officers for Justice, and Jesse J. Byrd v. The Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, United States of America v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.